Development Buzz: 750 Pacific Boulevard (Plaza of Nations Site)

Vancouver Canada News Development Buzz: 750 Pacific Boulevard (Plaza of Nations Site)
July 4, 2012
Posted by | 23 »

James K.M. Cheng Architects Inc. has submitted a proposal to build 1,700 to 2,000 residential units at the existing Plaza of Nations site. The proposal will also include retail, office, hotel, restaurants, and cafes. Moreover, there will be a community centre (badly needed), a daycare for 69 children, an ice rink (to be used by the Canucks and for the public), and sports science centre. The tallest building proposed is 30 storeys at a height of 87.5 metres.

The most daring feature of the proposal is the tall Skybridge building (this will be the second one if built, the first one is known as “Central” and is located on Main, near 1st). It’s great that the buildings do offer some sort of break from the norm for the area. The structure does cover up BC Place Stadium and it’s fancy new roof, which is really unfortunate. Being so close to the stadium, I can’t see these being marketed as high end units.

This project will also require the removal of the vastly underused Plaza of Nations building, Edgewater Casino and the nearby two night clubs.

From City of Vancouver Proposal Page, the following major public benefits include, among others, the following:

  • Community Centre: the heart of the neighbourhood amenity facilities is the Community Centre which includes, among other things; day care centre for 69 children; community rooms; publically accessible ice hockey/skating rink that will be used by the community and as a training facility for the Canucks; and a sports science centre. In addition, all operating costs will be absorbed and indemnified by the applicant
  • False Creek Seaside Walkway and Bike Route: completion of the north side False Creek seaside walkway and bike route between Coopers Park Neigh- bourhood and the foot of the Georgia Street axis will be achieved. This adds 363m (1,190 ft) of finished seaside walkway and bike route to False Creek.
  • Civic Plaza: a major public outdoor event space is proposed on the water- front at the southerly apex of the site. This flexible space of approximately 4,500m (48,500 sf) will accommodate a wide range of audiences ranging from small gatherings up to 4,000 people. The event calendar will primarily be focused between spring and fall. It has the potential of accommodating a variety of neighbourly activities such as music, art shows, theatre presen- tations, and neighbourhood gatherings. The Civic Plaza replaces the original event space in the Plaza of Nations. This location gives uninterrupted south- erly views to the water and maximizes sun access.
The project is a rather large one and at the moment it is mere proposal. However, if this was to go through as proposed the following 22 elements will be part of the project scope.

1 Community Centre
2 Daycare
3 Ice rink
4 Canucks facilities
5 Sports medicine
6 Expo forest
7 1,500 to 2,000 residential units
8 Retail at grade including restaurants and cafes
9 Commercial
10 Hotel
11 Civic Plaza
12 False Creek Seaside Walkway and Bike Route
13 Public open space deck
14 Public Ferry
15 Transient moorage
16 Non-motorized moorage
17 Commercial moorage
Shoreline Features
18 Naturalized foreshore in westerly bay
19 Extension of length of seaside walk on piles
20 Maintain easterly foreshore with seawalk on bridge
21 Sub-tidal reef
22 Subtidal and intertidal enhancements along shoreline

More photos of the proposal:

This project, along with Rogers Arena Rental/Office towers will ensure that the land surround the city’s two stadiums will be swarmed by construction cranes.

Source: Jlousa at SSP.com

  • Matt

    too square/linear, too much glass… let’s see something creative…

  • http://www.brixwork.com/ Jeff Kee

    Not sure, I think the simplicity is a nice contrast with the crown-shaped stadium behind it. Perhaps I’d like to see some rooftop greenery to “crown” it with some real goodies?

  • Ruth Rempel

    I wonder if Foster and Partners have thought of developing this site.  Jameson House was an amazing addition to Vancouver’s landscape. Mr. Norman Foster could certainly do the area justice. 

  • No

    Why to ruin the view of our newest landmark. 

  • Justin Macdonald

    Please, don’t make James Cheng the final architect for this…

  • Petitchat911

    i am gonna be forward… somebody shoot him please!

  • http://twitter.com/sutherland604 Robert Sutherland

    I can safely say I am all for the redevelopment of this area. The designs currently being proposed still need some work, but it is a HUGE step in the right direction for that under-used area

  • Shaun Smakal

    “It’s great that the buildings do offer SOME SORT OF break from the norm for the area.” (Emphasis mine.)

    Because we sure as hell can’t say what, specifically…

  • Guest

    It would be a shame to put buildings that are taller than the main base of the stadium at this site. The new roof makes a perfect “crown” and the surroundings should be built up toward the stadium from the waters edge. That would make a stunning view from the water and from across false creek.

    The design and ideas a great though. They would be awesome but I don’t feel like they fit the site, it looks as though they are pasted there and do not complement this city’s newest centerpiece.

  • Petitchat911

    you people are too nice!!  this is a terrible design!  a student can do better than this!  wtf?  where are all the good architects in vancity?  this proposal is so standard is like there is no hope for vancouver in design and architecture???!!  wake up people… this is so pathetic 

  • Dominicodimodena

    More of the same with a bridge to make it “world class”. James Cheng already admitted he knew better at the Vancouver Urban Forum. The public should be insulted. We need an architect with an outside perspective to offer something different to the city.

  • steve

    That is….really, really bad. Like….80s bad.

  • James O’Malley

    the crown, makes me frown – what a waste of tax payers dollars. $500 Million for a roof that can be opened 60 – 90 days a year. The previous roof was fun / marshmellow / bubble; this one detracts from the view and the sooner it is covered up the better. 

  • AJ

    Keep in mind that this is a proposal and that it is obviously not the final design for the buildings. The renderings you see are just “place marks” that show proposal for the massing and proposed heights for the site, not the final design… 

  • Chad

    This is so modern, and not interesting. The age of modernism in architecture is over. Look at the rest of the world: Paris, London, Copenhagen, Barcelona, the Emirates, China… it is time to catch up Vancouver. And although I like the glass, I am worried that the glazing will consist of cheap material and be improperly set. The reflections will be warped and messy making these ‘modern’ lines and curtain walls all distorted and cheap looking. For examples, just look at the Shangri-la, the new Residences on Georgia, the convention Centre, and many many others.

  • Westend

    incredibly boring design, nothing at all interesting about this.  I thought it was some kind of April fools joke in July!!  It would be shocking if the city approved something like this.

  • Rob

    Absolutely Aweful!!! James Cheng has already destroyed the north side of False creak with all those featureless white / green and glass towers now this! The Skybridge is just a gimmick to hide the fact that this proposal is uninspiring. What a waste of a great site.

  • Luke

    I love the existing mini forest, they should implement more greenery like that one. Also, roof top gardens would be a great addition. Overall, i think it a great start and it seems that this development has a lot of potential for the community.

  • Brock Carter

    Why are there so many people giving asians the “dirty look” in vancouver, i thought racism was a thing of the past. I am from Queens, New York and i have found that there are alot of people with an “attitude” in Vancouver. Just curious as a friendly neighbor, why is that?

  • http://twitter.com/dave_munroe Dave Munroe

    This is purely a conceptual drawing for the application process, and not exactly what the finished product will look like. The plain glass blocks in the drawing are showing the overall outline of what the buildings will look like on a site. Developers won’t spend $$ on real drawings until they have at least some form of approval from the city for the overall concept.

    I agree it would be nice to see the buildings frame the stadium a bit more to maintain the view of the new roof, rather than blocking it out. James Cheng likes simplicity, but I’d think the final product would have a bit more flare.

  • Guest

    Placing rental units this close to the stadium will only have tenants complaining about the roof lights glaring into their apartments at night. So then what … keep the lights turned off? 

  • Barb Janicek

    If the product had more flare, it would surely be quite flammable! ;)

  • http://twitter.com/Phanyxx ♔ Nick Routley

    It makes sense to add density to that area, but that “skybridge” seems like the only twist in an otherwise boring design. Personally, I think James Cheng can do better.